At 5:44 PM +0100 9/21/03, Diana Galletly wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Eric Gorr wrote:

 At 12:13 PM +0200 9/21/03, Kevin Venzke wrote:
 >But in most Participation failure examples
 >I've seen, the same candidate is not the winner in both sets.  For example,
 >for MCA:
^^^^^^^

What method did you use to determine that:

    5:A>B>C
    4:B>C>A
    2:C>A>B

was B?

Majority Choice Approval by the looks of it.

Yes...spotted it right after I send the message. Looks like it's time to apply standard excuse #12353...temporary blindness.



---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to