Will someone on the list who has studied range voting and compared it to Condorcet, approval, and other methods please comment on Doug Greene's paper? He appears to be saying that range voting is superior to all other single winner methods. Are there good arguments against this conclusion? Does range voting have serious flaws? If so, could someone briefly summarize them?
Thanks, Ralph Suter In a message dated 12/15/04 3:08:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The long-awaited results of the Nov. 2004 range-voting presidential > pseudo-election are now available. Paper also includes an > approval-voting pseudo-election and some other things! Packed with data > from the real world! > > http://math.temple.edu/~wds/homepage/works.html go to #82. ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
