Q wrote > > Just a thought, but stating "many vote theorists" without providing > supporting links to referreed articles might have led to the > bias decision. > > I'm not saying that your argument is like those supporting Intelligent > Design or denying Global Warming, but perhaps as a result of the furor > on those other topics, the wikipedia maintainers are a little > sensitive > to unsubstantiated claims.
I would go a little farther. Since Arrow's was a PROOF in which no one has found a flaw in over 50 years, I would say that anyone who has found fault with it is not a "vote theorist." ---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
