At 08:58 PM 5/12/2005, Curt Siffert wrote:

I recently posted this addendum to the Arrow's Theorem page on wikipedia: It was immediately deleted for "bias". [...]
Was I out in left field for writing this?

Have you asked in the comment page attached to the article? Another writer here pointed out that an assertion was made about the alleged opinion of some theorists without providing a reference. Without the reference, what was said could indeed resemble biased writing, since appeal to undefined authority is a characteristic of such writing. "Many experts say,..." is a technique for asserting a bias without openly admitting it as a personal opinion. Even if it is true. Rather, an encyclopedic way of writing might be "According to So-And-So, professor of Hokum at the University of Serious Delusion, the moon is indeed made of green cheese. Other experts who have expressed similar opinions include Donald Duck, Micky Mouse, and the Jolly Green Giant." :-)


(Of course, if the "experts" are asserted as such without a reasonable basis, this would still be non-encyclopedic and likely to get deleted or edited.)

There might already be more specific discussion on the comment page, did you look?

If inquiry about this on the comment page produces no satisfactory answer, then reposting, writing in the wikipedia encyclopedic fashion, which would include a specific reference when asserting a kind of authority that might be controversial, might be appropriate. Anyone can delete changes, what counts on wikipedia is what emerges as a consensus after discussion. I've seen quite a few edits reversed and re-reversed....

So, consider the implicit criticism -- as you seem to be doing --, come to your own conclusions, and respectfully assert it, if you think it will improve the article. You have just as much right to your opinion as any other wikipedian, except perhaps the owner, who mostly is an "absent god" who allows mere mortals to work out their differences.


---- Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to