election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: What are we all about? Bart Ingles
  • RE: [EM] What are we all about? Narins, Josh
  • [EM] Election law summit Jurij Toplak
  • Re: [EM] What are we all about? Joe Weinstein
• [EM] To Josh, re: coin-tossing MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Joseph Malkevitch
  • RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Bart Ingles
  • RE: [EM] Approval Strategy for the Average Citizen Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Another alternative to Tideman's estimating method MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] R.I.P. SVM? Alex Small
• [EM] Compromise/Composite of votes &margins for Schulze Method Stephanie Finney
• Re: Nash equilibrium for voting? Richard Moore
• [EM] Nash equilibrium for voting? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Nash equilibrium for voting? Alex Small
• [EM] Correction to SVM and Strong FBC Alex Small
• [EM] Strong FBC and the SVM Alex Small
• [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 3 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV completed pairwise-count example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet Criterion vs. Condorcet Efficiency Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Criterion vs. Condorcet Efficiency Bart Ingles
• RE: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Tarr, Adam
  • RE: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Tarr, Adam
• [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 2 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Fwd: Re: Approval vote Rob LeGrand
• [EM] 06/29/02 - The True Majority Ghost: Donald E Davison
  • [EM] Cyclic Ambiguities = misinformed voters? (was: The True Majority Ghost) Alex Small
• [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 1 MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Dave Ketchum reply, part 1 Forest Simmons
• [EM] 06/24/02 - The "true majority winner" Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] 06/24/02 - The 'true majority winner' Alex Small
• Re: Saari reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Saari reply Dave Ketchum
  • Re: Saari reply Bart Ingles
  • Re: Saari reply Dave Ketchum
  • Re: Saari reply Alex Small
  • Re: Saari reply Dave Ketchum
  • Re: Saari reply Forest Simmons
• [EM] 06/21/02 - `Majority' is not a valid word on the EM list: Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] 06/21/02 - `Majority' is not a valid word on the EM list: Dave Ketchum
• Re: [EM] Saari reply Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Saari reply Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari reply Joe Weinstein
  • RE: [EM] Saari reply Blake Cretney
  • RE: [EM] Saari reply Blake Cretney
• [EM] 06/16/02 - Let's `Sort-Out' the Candidates: Donald E Davison
  • RE: [EM] 06/16/02 - Let's `Sort-Out' the Candidates: Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] 06/16/02 - Let's `Sort-Out' the Candidates: Michael Rouse
• Re: [EM] Intriguing proposal & musings on strategy and autonomy Michael Rouse
• [EM] 06/13/02 - FWD - From: [email protected] Wed Jun 12 17:01:21 2002: Donald E Davison
• [EM] Intriguing proposal & musings on strategy and autonomy Alex Small
• [EM] Loya Jirga Joe Weinstein
• [EM] [OT] Loya Jirga To Elect New President of Afghanistan! Narins, Josh
• [EM] 06/11/02 - FWD of Mike Saari's letter: Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] 06/11/02 - FWD of Mike Saari's letter: Michael Rouse
• [EM] SPAM Narins, Josh
• [EM] wv & margins definitions & difference MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] wv & margins definitions & difference Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] The Condorcet question MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd) Rob Lanphier
• [EM] unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd) Rob Lanphier
  • RE: [EM] unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd) Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] unsatisfied with implications of Condorcet method (fwd Alex Small
  • [EM] winning votes vs margins... Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
  • RE:_[EM]_unsatisfied_with_implications_of_Condorcet_method Forest Simmons
• Re: Billiard-Ball Theory of Voting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] The billiard ball theory of voting Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] 1-seat Cumulative isn't FPTP? Richard Moore
  • [EM] Strategic values, not weights Richard Moore
• [EM] Relative Margins MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] ESD Candidates update Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC Richard Moore
• RE: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Tarr, Adam
  • RE: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Olli Salmi
  • RE: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Olli Salmi
  • [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists James Gilmour
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
  • Re: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
  • Re: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists James Gilmour
  • RE: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] D'Hondt without lists Olli Salmi
• Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The Small Voting Machine (was Strong FBC) Forest Simmons
• [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] 2-step CR: A proposal Richard Moore
• [EM] 05/23/02 - Single-Seat Cumulative is not FPTP: Donald Davison
  • RE: [EM] 05/23/02 - Single-Seat Cumulative is not FPTP: Narins, Josh
• [EM] 05/21/02 - FWD Math for those who want more Math: Donald Davison
• [EM] Relative margin definition and example Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Meaning clarification MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Why RP(wv) & CSSD meet GSFC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Alternative Vote (or IRV) using residual approval weights Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] 05/20/02 - True Majority Winner or Candidate: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 05/20/02 - True Majority Winner or Candidate: Michael Rouse
  • [EM] Question on Condorcet/Kemeny order Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] Question on Condorcet/Kemeny order Joseph Malkevitch
  • Re: [EM] Question on Condorcet/Kemeny order Joseph Malkevitch
• [EM] 05/20/02 - What `is' is (a la Clinton): Donald Davison
• [EM] IRV strategy correction MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] IRV strategy? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 05/18/02 - Rank Your Lowest Poll Favorite as Number One: Donald Davison
• [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: richard moore
  • Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Michael Rouse
  • RE: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] 05/16/02 - More Code Words: Richard Moore
• Re: [EM] 05/15/02 - Josh calls for more math: richard moore
  • RE: [EM] 05/15/02 - Josh calls for more math: Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Carey Diagrams Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Multiple-winners contest n.2 and next Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: Carey Diagrams Rob LeGrand
  • [EM] Request for criticism Rob LeGrand
• Re: [EM] 05/15/02 - Josh calls for more math: Alex Small
  • Re: Re: [EM] 05/15/02 - Josh calls for more math: Forest Simmons
• [EM] 05/15/02 - The Senate expects its `Pound of Pork Flesh': Donald Davison
• [EM] Poor Richard's Education Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Poor Richard's Education Forest Simmons
• [EM] 05/14/02 - Two plus Two correction: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 05/14/02 - Two plus Two correction: Michael Rouse
• [EM] Condorcet Criterion issue MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Alex Small
  • [EM] Response from a pit bull to a junk post Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Michael Rouse
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] 05/13/02 - The Education of Poor Richard: Richard Moore
• Re: Junk Election Methods MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: Free Software for Social Choice Polling MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Approval strategy Forest Simmons
• [EM] Use of "bit" Forest Simmons
• RE: [EM] Forest's 3-bit approval method Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] Forest's 3-bit approval method Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• re: [EM] Majority Choice Approval Alex Small
• Re: Democratizing the Senate Joe Weinstein
  • [EM] Free social choice polling software Arnold B. Urken
• RE: Democratizing the Senate (II) DEMOREP1
  • RE: Democratizing the Senate (II) Adam Tarr
  • Re: Democratizing the Senate (II) Michael Rouse
• [EM] Democratizing the Senate (II) Alex Small
• Re: [EM] aka [Junk Election Methods] 05/05/02 - Condorcet just does not make the cut: Alex Small
• Re: [EM] aka [Junk Election Methods] 05/05/02 - Condorcet just doesnot make the cut: Richard Moore
• [EM] aka [Junk Election Methods] 05/05/02 - FWD Math Background: Donald Davison
• [EM] Re: Strong FBC DEMOREP1
• Re: Modeling elections DEMOREP1
• [EM] Multiple winner election.2 summary and next Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] [Junk Election Methods] 05/03/02 - The Lower Choices are Mostly Junk: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] [Junk Election Methods] 05/03/02 - The Lower Choices are Mostly Junk: Dave Ketchum
• re:[EM] Strong FBC Alex Small
• RE: 05/02/02 - The So Called Compromise Candidate: DEMOREP1
• re: [EM] Three Level Approval Alex Small
• Re: Strong FBC DEMOREP1
  • RE: Strong FBC DEMOREP1
• [EM] The "so called" compromise candidate Alex Small
• [EM] 05/02/02 - The So Called Compromise Candidate: Donald Davison
• [EM] Gerrymander Cases 2001- 2002 DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] Strong FBC Alex Small
  • re: [EM] Strong FBC Alex Small
  • re: [EM] Strong FBC Alex Small
  • Re: Strong FBC Rob LeGrand
  • Re: Strong FBC Forest Simmons
  • Re: Strong FBC Adam Tarr
  • Re: Strong FBC Rob LeGrand
  • [EM] Approval Strategy Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] Approval Strategy Arnold B. Urken
  • [EM] Approval strategy A Rob LeGrand
  • Re: Strong FBC Adam Tarr
  • Re: Strong FBC Forest Simmons
  • re: [EM] strong FBC Alex Small
• Re: [EM] Modeling elections Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Modeling elections Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Modeling elections Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Modeling elections Richard Moore

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]