Messages by Date
-
2005/12/01
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/12/01
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
Steve Eppley
-
2005/12/01
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
rob brown
-
2005/12/01
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
James Gilmour
-
2005/12/01
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
rob brown
-
2005/12/01
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
Steve Eppley
-
2005/12/01
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
rob brown
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
Jan Kok
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
Andrew Myers
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
rob brown
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
James Gilmour
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/30
[EM] ignoring "strength of opinion"
rob brown
-
2005/11/30
Re: [EM] Javascript matrix/bar chart generator
rob brown
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] Javascript matrix/bar chart generator
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/11/29
[EM] Javascript matrix/bar chart generator
rob brown
-
2005/11/29
[EM] Condorcet cycle and FBLE probabilities... serious & instructive error; slick example
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Andrew Myers
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/29
[EM] Fw: Instant Run-Off
Toplak Jurij
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] sample data?
Eric Gorr
-
2005/11/29
[EM] sample data?
rob brown
-
2005/11/29
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] FBLE probabilities - amazing but true
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/28
[EM] FBLE probabilities - amazing but true
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/28
Re: [EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/28
[EM] thoughts on the pairwise matrix
rob brown
-
2005/11/28
[EM] democracy conference in Madrid December 1-3
Stephen Turner
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Dan Bishop
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/27
[EM] I think Bishop's deconstruction algorithm fails
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/27
Re: [EM] Real-world effects
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/27
[EM] Real-world effects
rob brown
-
2005/11/26
Re: [EM] Bishop's Condorcet Matrix Deconstruction
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/26
Re: [EM] Bishop's Condorcet Matrix Deconstruction
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/26
Re: [EM] Bishop's Condorcet Matrix Deconstruction
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/11/26
Re: [EM] Bishop's DMD decomposition
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/25
[EM] single elimination tournaments
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/11/25
Re: [EM] Condorcet Matrix Decomposition
Dan Bishop
-
2005/11/25
Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 17, Issue 46
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/25
[EM] Bishop's DMD decomposition
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/25
Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 17, Issue 46
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/25
Re: [EM] A new little article
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/25
Re: [EM] Condorcet Matrix Decomposition
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/24
[EM] Condorcet Matrix Decomposition
Dan Bishop
-
2005/11/24
Re: [EM] A new little article
RLSuter
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Gervase Lam
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/23
[EM] A new little article
rob brown
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] Election Methods Web software: which ones do you know?
Brian Olson
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/23
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
rob brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
rob brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Gervase Lam
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] what is this method called?
Gervase Lam
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Gervase Lam
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Gervase Lam
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] what is this method called?
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
rob brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] what is this method called?
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] what is this method called?
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
rob brown
-
2005/11/22
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] what is this method called?
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/21
[EM] what is this method called?
rob brown
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Gervase Lam
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Rob Brown
-
2005/11/21
[EM] Bucklin PR ?
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/21
Re: [EM] "scored condorcet", etc
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/20
[EM] "scored condorcet", etc
rob brown
-
2005/11/19
Re: [EM] FBC definition (mine)
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/19
[EM] FBC definition (mine)
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/19
[EM] clones and FBC - a very interesting conjecture
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/19
Re: [EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/19
[EM] clones and FBC
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/19
[EM] FBC survey & Simmons latest lottery method
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/19
Re: [EM] MDD incmpatible with cloneproofness?
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/19
[EM] oped in Mercury News on Citizens' Assemblies (forwarded from Steven Hill)
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/19
[EM] MDD incmpatible with cloneproofness?
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/18
[EM] Two round system (improved Approval version)
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/18
Re: [EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/18
[EM] IRV splits majorities to empower everyone?
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/18
Re: [EM] Survey of voting methods obeying Mike Ossipoff's "Favorite Betrayal Criterion"
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/11/18
[EM] Range Voting & strategy theorems
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/18
[EM] Survey of voting methods obeying Mike Ossipoff's "Favorite Betrayal Criterion"
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/18
Re: [EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/18
Re: [EM] Delete this if you are offended by non-deterministic methods
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/11/18
[EM] IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy?
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/18
Re: [EM] Fwd: The point is that IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy
James Gilmour
-
2005/11/18
Re: [EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/17
[EM] Fwd: IRV splits majorities to empower everyone, & find common ground
IRV Alliance
-
2005/11/17
[EM] Fwd: The point is that IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy
IRV Alliance
-
2005/11/17
[EM] Delete this if you are offended by non-deterministic methods
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/11/17
[EM] In MDDA, Kerry-refusers should co-operate by ranking Kerry
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/11/17
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
rob brown
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secretproxy ballot
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
rob brown
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secretproxy ballot
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
rob brown
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] Fwd: The point is that IRV (not PR) fosters peaceful democracy
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
rob brown
-
2005/11/16
[EM] One more obvious thing about Approval
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] simple question (I think)
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/16
[EM] simple question (I think)
rob brown
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] Fwd: Peaceful democracy logic needed, also links for new ElectionMethods page
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/16
[EM] A quick, dirty, and somewhat obvious method for a secret proxy ballot
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/16
Re: [EM] Fwd: Peaceful democracy logic needed, also links for new ElectionMethods page
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/11/15
[EM] Retiring from voting systems. Poll suggestions.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/15
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/11/14
[EM] Fwd: [InstantRunoffCO] Dec IRV event in Aspen?
Jan Kok
-
2005/11/14
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/11/13
[EM] working paper on delegable proxy voting
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/11/13
[EM] Fwd: Peaceful democracy logic needed, also links for new ElectionMethods page
IRV Alliance
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/13
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/11/12
[EM] Public elections are the ones that matter.
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] corrctions to older psts re IRV public election data
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] Why study only public election proposals?
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] another lottery method
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] STV-PR is not reweighted IRV and not House-Monotonic (was " corrections to older posts re IRV public election data")
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/12
[EM] STV-PR is not reweighted IRV and not House-Monotonic (was " corrections to older posts re IRV public election data")
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/12
[EM] STV-PR is not reweighted IRV and not House-Monotonic (was " corrections to older posts re IRV public election data")
Chris Benham
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] corrctions to older psts re IRV public election data
Warren Smith
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] Why study only public election proposals?
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] Why study only public election proposals?
James Green-Armytage
-
2005/11/12
Re: [EM] Why study only public election proposals?
James Green-Armytage