On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Greg Nisbet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is called Cardinal Condorcet or something like that and is detailed > here: http://fc.antioch.edu/~james_green-armytage/cwp13.htm
This is interesting. I am unsure why the voter has to submit both a ranked list and a rated ballot, especially since they have to be consistant with each other. Surely, the rankings can be inferred from the ratings. I guess some voters might just want to cast a rankings ballot and be done with it. In that case, they can just rate 9-8-7-6-5-4 ... (though it does mean that they have to reverse order from a normal ranking ballot). ---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
