election-methods
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Juho Laatu
[EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Vidar Wahlberg
Re: [EM] Biproportional representation (was Re: Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats)
Juho Laatu
[EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Vidar Wahlberg
[EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
[EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
[EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EM] Preferential voting system where a candidate may win multiple seats
Chris Benham
[EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] irv and the politics of electoral reform.
Juho Laatu
[EM] All systems of voting are probably deeply flawed
Benjamin Grant
[EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Warren needs to double check his work.
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kathy Dopp
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kathy Dopp
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
[EM] re James Gilmour
David L Wetzell
[EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Fwd: Is it professional?
James Gilmour
[EM] Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Is it professional?
Juho Laatu
[EM] random eg w. improved version of IRV3.
David L Wetzell
[EM] Why Random by itself doesn't cut it.
David L Wetzell
[EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Benjamin Grant
[EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] Question about the Plurality Criterion
Benjamin Grant
[EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] [CES #8922] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8924] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8957] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #8970] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] [CES #8972] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #8973] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] [CES #8967] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kevin Venzke
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] [CES #8955] Re: Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Benjamin Grant
[EM] Score Voting and Approval Voting not practically substantially different from Plurality?
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] Subject: Here's what a random IRV election looks like
Kathy Dopp
[EM] Here's what a random IRV election looks like
Warren D Smith
[EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Richie/FairVote offer fix to Top Two primary, now let's offer to fix RCV!
David L Wetzell
[EM] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems
Warren D Smith
Re: [EM] [CES #8854] impossibility theorem for monetizing voting systems
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
[EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems
Warren D Smith
Re: [EM] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems
Warren D Smith
Re: [EM] [CES #8844] Vague impossibility conjecture for monetizing voting systems
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
[EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #8843] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] [CES #8848] Re: MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
[EM] MAV on electowiki
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
[EM] MAV on electowiki
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
[EM] MAV on electowiki
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] MAV on electowiki
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
[EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] HELP: Re: inline replies and Outlook 201x
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
[EM] List issues?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] List issues?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] List issues?
Juho Laatu
[EM] Shout out of thanks
Benjamin Grant
[EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Juho Laatu
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
[EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Chris Benham
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* work together after all?
Chris Benham
[EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Deconstructing the Majority Criterion
Juho Laatu
[EM] Monetized score voting
Warren D Smith
Re: [EM] Monetized score voting
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Jameson
David L Wetzell
[EM] List question
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] List question
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] List question
Benjamin Grant
[EM] A dissent for Ben
David L Wetzell
Re: [EM] A dissent for Ben
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] A dissent for Ben
Benjamin Grant
[EM] Re to Ben Grant's first post.
David L Wetzell
[EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Jameson Quinn
Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Voting Criteria 101, Four Criteria
Jameson Quinn
[EM] Absolutely new here
Benjamin Grant
Re: [EM] Absolutely new here
Kristofer Munsterhjelm
Re: [EM] Absolutely new here
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Re: [EM] Absolutely new here
Jameson Quinn
Earlier messages
Later messages