What those considering, or later doing, Condorcet voting should
consider. Fred's last principle, about participation, caught my eye.
Those writing of Condorcet voting often promote formally ranking all
candidates (the least liked retains its position even if the only one
not formally ranked). I read that as excessive since it goes against
the principle by demanding more effort than useful in properly
choosing as winner. To clarify:
Assuming a voter has found ranking A to be satisfying "the full extent
of the individual's desire and ability", then ranking only A is a
proper vote and would have the same effect as a similar vote in
FPTP. Note that in FPTP voters often are tortured by wanting to vote
for more than one, but being unable to.
Assuming a voter has found A & others to be equally satisfying "the
full extent of the individual's desire and ability", then ranking them
alike is a proper vote and would have the same effect as a similar
vote in Approval.
Assuming a voter has found A & B, with A preferred, to be satisfying
"the full extent of the individual's desire and ability", but showing
preference by ranking both with A higher than B is doable here, though
not in FPTP or Approval.
Combinations of the above ranking are permitted, leaving as many as
the voter may choose at the bottom (unranked) level.
Dave Ketchum
On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Fred Gohlke wrote:
If one wishes to "distribute a formal statement of the election-
method principles that we agree upon.", would it not be wise to
start by finding out which principles command agreement?
Perhaps it would be better to take one step back and jointly define
the principles before attempting a formal statement. One
possibility might start something like this:
Electoral Method Principles:
* Principles express a consensus.
* No principle has primacy over another principle.
* Any principle can be challenged by rational argument.
Principles of human interaction:
* The interactions between humans is known as politics.
* The scope of politics is immense.
* The immensity of politics requires organization.
* The first step of forming an organization is to define its
principles.
Principles of government:
* The people have the right to define their government.
* The Electoral Method must implement government by the people.
* Government by the people means that every individual in the
society can participate in the political process to the full
extent of the individual's desire and ability.
It is not my place to list the principles for this board, except as
an example, so the foregoing is merely a suggested outline.
Participants in the discussion must define the principles important
to them, and should do so before attempting a formal statement
alleged to be supported by all members.
Fred Gohlke
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
