I like the idea (from Jameson Quinn) of allowing our signature-line
preferences to include methods that are not mentioned in the formal
statement. (I had suggested only allowing the names of methods that are
formally supported.)
To prevent these expressed preferences from becoming too long, I suggest
limiting them to 100 characters (including the word "prefers").
I'm not as enthusiastic about the idea of including an "exemplary list"
in the declaration based on how many signatures express preference for a
specific method. That's because, as we know, it's easy to "stuff the
ballot box", including by getting signatures from "experts" who aren't
really election-method experts. As it is, supporters of each election
method will try to get fellow supporters to sign, in hopes of making it
appear that their method is more popular than other election methods.
Richard Fobes
On 8/25/2011 4:35 AM, Jameson Quinn wrote:
2011/8/25 Peter Zbornik <pzbor...@gmail.com <mailto:pzbor...@gmail.com>>
Dear all,
please consider including a list of endorsed election methods for
proportional elections, just as you have done for single winner
elections. Otherwise the bold statement will just cover one special
case in election theory - single winner elections.
The statement does address proportional methods. Essentially, it
endorses any non-closed-list system. The problem with including a list
is that there are too many good options. I was afraid that even if we
explicitly stated that the list was only meant to be exemplary, not
exhaustive, it would be an invitation for potential statement signers to
battle over what should be included.
So, how about this: when you state your intention to sign, you can
mention one or two PR systems, and any systems which get mentioned twice
or more will be on the exemplary list.
JQ
Furthermore you might consider covering the issues of
(i) proportional rank orders. For instance when electing the party
list in primaries, in countries where closed lists are used.
(ii) proportional rank orders to elect a hierarchy of functions
proportionally, like board president, vice presidents and other
board members.
Best regards
Peter Zborník
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
