> >> If I've read you correctly here, it seems to me that you should sign the >> statement. You agree with everything it says, even if you wish it said some >> other things. And if you're truly being open-minded about this, you will >> want to avoid the circular logic involved in not signing. ("I won't sign it >> because it doesn't have wide enough support.") >> > > dlw: Ah, but I can't support giving a lot of attention to single-winner > reforms when the empirical evidence suggests that it's the mix of > multi-winner and single-winner that is of far greater import. > > Seriously? You won't eat our chips and fish, because that's the wrong way around?
Jameson
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info