Simon Wright <[email protected]> writes: > On 9 Feb 2016, at 09:47, Simon Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> And yes, github looks like the natural place; the tools for managing >> forks look good, at least as far as I've tried them. > > I've just had fun setting up a Github repo. > > Process: building on my normal workflow (sync with mtn; hg convert to > a Mercurial repo), I've converted to git using hg-fast-export, removed > non-relevant branches, run the tests, and pushed to Github. > > I think I may have gone too far, by removing the opentoken and > fasttoken branches ..?
As Ludovic says, those should go in their own git repo. > And I'm not sure whether you (Stephe) want to keep all your > development branches? This would be a good time to drop some. > And I may be committing a sin by naming the master branch > org.emacs.ada-mode rather than just master> In monotone, a branch name should be globally unique, because it is the branch that is synced between repositories. In git, branch names are only locally unique; every time you declare a "remote" branch in git, you map the local name to the remote url + name. > Anyway, see what you think. I can always start over if necessary! I think I'll stay a monotone hold out a little longer. So ada-mode will stay on monotone until it dies, or another maintainer takes over. -- -- Stephe _______________________________________________ Emacs-ada-mode mailing list [email protected] http://host114.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/emacs-ada-mode_stephe-leake.org
