Matthew Lundin writes: > Hi Eric, > > Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk>, Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk> > writes: > > > Would something like > > > > * TODO $U %? > > > > still work (or with %t instead of %U obviously)? > > I just tried this and it worked for me (i.e., showed up in the agenda). > But I'm sure there are finer points that I'm missing. > > Best, > Matt
And I have also tried it. And that fixes the problem (which I hadn't yet noticed) of an improperly formatted TODO entry. However, my original question still stands: does it really make sense for org-mode's agenda view to take the "time" for an activity that has been scheduled for that day from an inactive time stamp when the active one in the SCHEDULE entry has no time element? I can use %u to not have the time in the inactive time stamp but that's simply avoiding the issue... something I am happy to do if need be but would rather like to avoid! :-) _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
