Carsten Dominik writes: > > However, my original question still stands: does it really make sense > > for org-mode's agenda view to take the "time" for an activity that has > > been scheduled for that day from an inactive time stamp when the > > active one in the SCHEDULE entry has no time element? > > The reason for this behavior is that I wanted to support things like > > * TODO Meeting at 2pm > <2009-01-01 Thu> > > i.e. loose time information that may be in the header. > > The regular expression looking for a time also matches the > time you had in the time stamp.
Ah, okay, that makes perfect sense. Thanks! I guess I don't think of having the time and date separate ever but I can where others might like that. > I think the right approach is to not put the time stamp into the > header line at all. Why would you want the *creation* time in such > an exposed place???? It's because I sometimes want to sort entries according to date/time of creation as opposed to date/time of actual activity performed. I can work around this without difficulty, I think, so thanks all again for all the input! _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
