On Feb 20, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Matthew Lundin writes:
Hi Eric,
Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk>, Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk>
writes:
Would something like
* TODO $U %?
still work (or with %t instead of %U obviously)?
I just tried this and it worked for me (i.e., showed up in the
agenda).
But I'm sure there are finer points that I'm missing.
Best,
Matt
And I have also tried it. And that fixes the problem (which I hadn't
yet noticed) of an improperly formatted TODO entry.
However, my original question still stands: does it really make sense
for org-mode's agenda view to take the "time" for an activity that has
been scheduled for that day from an inactive time stamp when the
active one in the SCHEDULE entry has no time element?
The reason for this behavior is that I wanted to support things like
* TODO Meeting at 2pm
<2009-01-01 Thu>
i.e. loose time information that may be in the header.
The regular expression looking for a time also matches the
time you had in the time stamp.
I can use %u to not have the time in the inactive time stamp but
that's simply avoiding the issue... something I am happy to do if need
be but would rather like to avoid! :-)
I think the right approach is to not put the time stamp into the
header line at all. Why would you want the *creation* time in such
an exposed place????
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
