Sebastian Miele <sebastian.mi...@gmail.com> writes: > In an example for Org table range references it says: > > ‘@2$1..@4$3’ six fields between these two fields (same as ‘A2..C4’)
Oh, that mistake has been around for a long time. > However, it are nine fields instead of six. If we were to simply replace "six" with "nine", I think the description could still be confusing because it's ambiguous whether "between" includes the ends. (I would tend to read the above description as exclusive.) How about "nine fields between and including these two fields"? Any other suggestions?
