Sebastian Miele <sebastian.mi...@gmail.com> writes: > Sebastian Miele <sebastian.mi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> But how about instead changing the first sentence of the "Range >> references" section from >> >> You may reference a rectangular range of fields by specifying two >> field references connected by two dots ‘..’. >> >> to >> >> You may reference a rectangular range of fields, including the ends, >> by specifying two field references connected by two dots ‘..’. >> >> ? > > I think even better would be to just add the following after the > sentence mentioned above: > > The ends are included in the range. > >
Yes, a general statement (outside of this particular example) seems like a good idea. Then changing the "six" to "nine" does not need any further elaboration. -- Nick "There are only two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors." -Martin Fowler
