Sebastian Miele <sebastian.mi...@gmail.com> writes: > > But how about instead changing the first sentence of the "Range > references" section from > > You may reference a rectangular range of fields by specifying two > field references connected by two dots ‘..’. > > to > > You may reference a rectangular range of fields, including the ends, > by specifying two field references connected by two dots ‘..’. > > ?
I think even better would be to just add the following after the sentence mentioned above: The ends are included in the range.
