Hi Jarmo, Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hu...@iki.fi> writes:
> (I wonder if it would be possible to have timestamps in worg. I have > bumped into situations before where I have not known the temporal > relationship between worg documentation and current org version.) Good point. I think worg documentation, when related to a specific Org feature, should mention the Org version it relates to, rather than a timestamp. As an additional info, the timestamp is good, but not enough. Let's try to follow this convention from now on. -- Bastien
