Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> [LSP is a evil plot from microsoft] Hi Jean, I can see that you're overly concerned about Microsoft being able to somehow exert control over this. It may assuage your concerns to see an example "technology stack" that Org-LSP could fit into. 1. Org / Emacs, all GPL-3 2. Rust LSP server + Rust cargo extensions, none of which are written by M$ (all GPL-compatable) 3. Kakoune LSP = Rust, using the "unlicence" licence 4. Kakoune (an experimental text editor, with /no/ relation to M$) Microsoft has provided a /standard/ that a huge number of editors/IDEs have adopted with /independent implementations/. At this point there is /nothing/ M$ could do to interfere with how the above works. You seem to be focusing on the term "server" in the name. This seems to be a red herring in this case. In LSP the server is analogous to "emacs --daemon" and the client to "emacsclient". I appreciate your concerns Jean, and am aware of Microsoft's history, however I do not believe there is any factual basis for your conclusions in this instance. There is no need to loose sleep over an LSP Server for Org existing :) On the contrary, I think it has the potential to ultimately enrich the Org community (see previous discussions). -- Timothy.
