Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: > Bastien, > > A message in this thread > https://orgmode.org/list/87tuiaxivh....@posteo.net/ (Juan Manuel > Macías, Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:23:14 +0000) contains a patch that fixes a > Shakespeare's sonnet in org-manual.org > > Due to updated ORG-NEWS file, it could not be applied directly. I had > it applied after > > commit d74a82448bc28dd9be7b57611038bbb4c7172bce > Author: Sébastien Miquel <sebastien.miq...@posteo.eu> > Date: Fri May 28 21:14:22 2021 +0200 > > and in such form it could be rebased to main. Alternatively ORG-NEWS > part could be just dropped (and applied later). > > The story is the following: > - 91373e15c8 doc/org-manual.org 13905 (Juan Manuel Macías > 2021-05-15 15:44:36 +0200 13906) > a documentation for verse formatting was added with a strange variant > (spread over net though) > - 215d80d02b doc/org-manual.org 13907 (Stefan Kangas 2021-09-16 > 14:40:12 -0700 13909) > besides other typos, one in this verse was fixed > - 4271f228db doc/org-manual.org 13909 (Marco Wahl 2021-09-20 > 12:09:31 +0200 13909) > reverted one edit by Stefan likely assuming old English spelling. > > Nobody has an idea concerning origin of current variant (particular > edition of Shakespeare's book), so Juan Manuel created the patch with > variant published in recent books. > > In https://orgmode.org/list/sin28h$ufv$1...@ciao.gmane.io/ > I tried to add the following header > X-Woof-Patch: org-manual.org, ORG-NEWS: fix Shakespeare' sonnet and > another typo > but the patch is not tracked currently on updates.orgmode.org > > On 25/09/2021 18:08, Marco Wahl wrote: >> Juan Manuel Macías writes: >> >>> I attach a patch with Shakespeare's sonnet completely fixed: the poem is >>> replaced by the version included in Wikipedia (Shakespeare, William. >>> Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Bloomsbury Arden 2010. >>> p. 113). I also removed a spurious phrase that I put in that patch >>> (Org-News). >> Thanks for the fix of the ORGNEWS entry. Nitpick: I'd prefer the >> fix of >> the ORGNEWS in a further patch for a little bit of more clarity. > > I agree with such remark, however I still suppose that the patch could > be applied even in current variant.
Please go ahead with the patches as you like! That nitpick is meant as a hint for commits to come! Regards, -- Marco