Max Nikulin [2022-12-14 23:02:53] wrote: > On 14/12/2022 21:35, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Like I said in another message that I sent just before receiving yours >>> my conclusion came from the fact that hitting 'C-h v' with the cursor >>> on 'org-goto-interface' provided nothing. It was the first time this >>> ever happened to me. I did try to explicitly enter the variable's >>> name by entering 'org-goto<TAB>', which (like 'org-go<TAB>') is not >>> enough: it is completed to 'org--goto'. >> AFAICT this is a missing feature: we obey `help-enable-autoload` in >> `describe-function` but we fail to do the same autoloading dance in >> `describe-variable`. > > I think, the difference is interactive vs. non-interactive calls rather than > `describe-function' vs. `describe-variable'. What misses this feature is > `customize-variable'. > > Completion failure for "org-to" happened because result of > `register-definition-prefixes' calls is not considered as options. I am > aware that it may give false positives, but I still believe they should > be added.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're saying. > Though I believe that org mixed version issue happens due to transitional > dependency of some third party package on org or something like (require > 'org-protocol) that can not be loaded on demand. Hmm... indeed the "Subject:" talks about mixed versions, yet I was discussing something not directly related. Looks like I got off-topic somewhere along the way without noticing, sorry. Stefan