Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: >> Max Nikulin writes: >>> I am unsure if any "PREFIX:" should be recognized as a link type, but >>> there is another possibility on this way: allow users to mark some >>> prefixes as search links, not link types. >> >> May you elaborate? > > I am considering another behavior. If any PREFIX: is recognized then the > link exported literally as PREFIX:PATH unless the PREFIX is registered as > > (org-link-register-search-link-prefix "sec") > > So if the document does not contain PREFIX:NAME target then it is an > export error (or another prescription controlled by > `org-export-with-broken-links') and it may be reported so by `org-lint'. > > Different users expect different degree of strictness during link > export. I am unsure which variant is better.
I feel that it will be too complex. We might simply throw a warning when we get unregistered [[type:path]] link, so that the user can notice if there is any problem. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
