Matt <m...@excalamus.com> writes: > Since we're considering this for all babel backends, "interpreter-args" > wouldn't describe gcc or other compilers. What about :command-args, > :command-args, :cmd-args? "Command" is the only thing I can think of that > describes all of the languages, other than maybe "binary" or "executable". > Maybe we could simply use ":args"? Maybe ":meta-args" since gcc or bash is > meta to the script/artifact?
I am not a big fan. It might be easily confused with :script-args. Maybe instead use two different extra arguments: :interpreter-args / :compiler-args ? Then, also :script-args / :program-args -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
