Stefan Nobis <stefan...@snobis.de> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > >> +1m! is awkward - what if [2024-05-12 +1m!]? > > You are right. I have not really spent time to think about a nice > syntax. But I think it needs to be encoded in the increment part, not > in the date part (because after the first increment, the information > that we want the last day of each month would be lost; and always > using yyyy-(mm+1)--1 also seems a bit awkward).
It does not have to be lost. We can adjust the repeater function to handle negative dates/months specially, so that [2024-05--1 +1m] -> [2024-06--1 +1m] > So maybe "+1mx" or some other way to encode "go to last day of next > month" directly into the increment? How does it make my example with [2024-05-12 +1m!] any less awkward? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
