Christian Moe <[email protected]> writes: > Looking at GNU ELPA, it seems they only list two ob-*.el packages, > ob-haxe.el and ob-asymptote.el. > > Both are documented in Worg, but the Babel languages index page does not > link to the Haxe documentation, whereas ob-asymptote.el is wrongly > listed as a part of org-contrib. > > To my mind, this suggests that we /should/ add a section listing the two > GNU ELPA packages and link properly to the documentation from there, and > we can add any further additions (especially if they write up a docs > page for Worg).
+1 for listing packages that have documentation on WORG. Although we may need to check if that documentation is up-to-date, especially for packages that used to be in org-contrib. Maybe contact the maintainers to double-check. > Meanwhile, there are some 80 ob-*.el packages on Melpa, from the fairly > obscure to Rust and PHP. Should we list them as well? It wouldn't be a > problem, but it would need to be updated every now and then, and it > wouldn't add value to what people can already do with list-packages if > they've added Melpa. Perhaps we should list only those that put up a > docs page on Worg (none at present?). There gotta be a way to do it programmatically I think. We should be able to fetch all the packages from ELPA/MELPA and search for names matching ob-*. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
