On 2025-12-20, at 20:27, Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] writes: > >> On 2025-12-20, at 19:54, Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Strictly speaking, there is no written policy, but because AI code >>> cannot be copyrighted, it may interfere with GPL, so we cannot accept >> >> Out of curiosity: how do we know that "AI code cannot be copyrighted"? >> (I'm not saying it can, I genuinely want to know.) > > Because it is current USA law position (GNU s under USA > jurisdiction). More specifically, it is USA law position on 100% > AI-generated content. When the AI-generated content is modified, things > get more tricky and not fully clear. > > Copyright does not extend to purely AI-generated material, or material > where there > is insufficient human control over the expressive elements. > > Whether human contributions to AI-generated outputs are sufficient to > constitute > authorship must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. > ---- Part 2, https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ > > Some other countries have different policies, but GNU is mainly > concerned about the USA.
Thanks. -- Marcin Borkowski https://mbork.pl https://crimsonelevendelightpetrichor.net/
