Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > You are right indeed. > However, I do not see then that what you observe in org-todo being a > feature. Simply a side effect of the internal implementation details. > You may call it a (minor) bug. > >>> and, additionally, might introduce new bugs because the rest of the >>> org-todo code operates under assumption that the heading we work with is >>> not commented while todo is being changed. >> >> That is a valid concern. I'll have to look into that. > > This is the only remaining concern. > I recall that rewriting org-todo that I did no maintenance branch was > non-trivial and I left that comment/uncomment logic intact because it > was not clear what the consequences would be. >
This is a pretty core part of org-mode so it's understandable we both have lots of fear, uncertainty, and doubt here. Let's shelf this for now. I'll do more playing with testcover later to add test coverage for the relevant code and we can revisit this then.
