Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:35:43 +1000, "Alan E. Davis" <lngn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I use the gri plotting language to make plots. Does anyone here use this? >> >> I am over my head in trying to use babel as a literate programming tool; yet >> that's exactly what I need to do, else at least have a method for >> coordinating better comments / notes with the code. > > Alan, > > I don't use gri. I have had a quick look at it and it should be > possible (for others, not me :() to create an org-babel interface for > this. If you have any elisp knowledge, you could try starting from > one of the existing language implementations. You could also try to > use the support for sh in org-babel but you'd have to get the table > data into a file first.
If this is something you're interested in, you could start by making a copy of org-babel-gnuplot.el, and then search/replace gnuplot/gri, and you'll be most of the way there. The gnuplot file already has support for dropping tables to tab-separated files, and then placing the paths to those files into the body of code blocks, which may be sufficient for table support in gri -- although having not heard of gri before this email I can't say for sure. Best -- Eric > Others may have more reasonable suggestions, however... > > I am surprised, however, at this comment: > >> Gnuplot was ok when I didn't need quailty graphs. > > in what way does gnuplot fall short in terms of quality? (but keep > this part of the conversatino off-list please to avoid annoying others) _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode