On Jul 1, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Jul 1, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Bastien wrote: >> >>> Hi Nicolas, >>> >>> Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> Correcting myself, I paste here another try to the problem at >>>> hand. Indeed, moving an item to a list he doesn't directly belong to >>>> makes little sense. Thus, the item will be moved at the end of its >>>> list. >>> >>> Nice. Such a move could be bound to M-<up> when the cursor is on the >>> first item, instead of throwing an error, as it does now. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> This does sound counter-intuitive to me. >> >> - Carsten >> > > I agree but there *is* some precedence for this type of behaviour in > Emacs: e.g. the bs buffer display package where moving up (<up>) at the > top of the list of buffers takes you to the bottom of the list and vice > versa (<down>)?
I think this is different. You are talking about selecting an item. Moving list items feels different, at least for me. - Carsten
