Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Yes, we can add some ad-hoc isearch hack in server.el for it. >>> It's kind of ugly, tho. > >> No doubt. Having server.el forcefully exit from recursive edits and >> abort isearches is inellegant. > > I don't think the behavior is inelegant (it's not great, but there's not > much we can do without major changes to Emacs). So I think the forceful > exit from recursive minibuffers is OK (it's generic), whereas the isearch > part is a complete hack.
In the absence of > The better fix is "easy": implement concurrency in Emacs (at least the > cooperating form of it). ..., why don't we live with this hack for the time being? _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
