Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change

[Kai . Grossjohann]

"Edward J. Sabol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  > Boo hiss, regarding the name change. rssh.el has a certain allure
  > that rcp.el just doesn't have. I agree that the defaults should be
  > for rsh and rcp because of what RMS said, but I don't see the name
  > change as particularly warranted.

Hm.  I actually like rcp.el better, I think.  I would've chosen scp.el
instead of rssh.el had I thought of it before.  I was also thinking of
remote.el but that was too general.  Maybe
remotely-by-remote-shell-and-remote-copy.el would be a most
descriptive name, yet... :-)

kai
-- 
I like _b_o_t_h kinds of music.