Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change

[Kai . Grossjohann]

"Stefan Monnier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  > I'm still wondering what is the point of allowing rsh and ssh.
  > ssh can do anything rsh can, so if you have ssh, why use rsh ?

Hm.  If you have ssh locally, then it can do the rsh protocol, too.
So in this case, no rsh is needed.

But ssh is not free, so rcp.el must be able to work with rsh (and this
must be the default) if it is to be distributed with Emacs, says Richard.

kai
-- 
I like _b_o_t_h kinds of music.