Re: rcp.el 1.48: name change, defaults change

[Kai . Grossjohann]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes:

  > We already *have* a syntax for specifying these things, URLs. We
  > went back and forth on this spanning xemacs-beta and the efs
  > mailing list.  There's no technical reason not to use URLs, the
  > only problem is that no one has stepped forward to write it.

I have this on my todo list, but I make no promises.  I had been kind
of hoping to avoid this issue for a while, but now that Francesco said
that rcp.el should be able to use *both* rcp *and* scp, the whole
thing is getting a little more pressing.  Hmpf.  I still don't know
exactly what to do (should URLs be the only syntax? should URLs be
the preferred syntax? the secondary syntax?), though.  So don't hold
your breath.

kai
-- 
I like _b_o_t_h kinds of music.