Re: Time for Tramp 2.0?

[Kai Großjohann]

On 26 Feb 2001, Daniel Pittman wrote:

> Once it got there, I figured that establishing a branch in CVS and
> committing it, then porting the various file operation handlers to
> the new infrastructure was in order.
> 
> I am happy to listen to suggestions for non-branch based work, but
> given it would be new code and a (slightly) incompatible syntax, I
> didn't want to drop it directly into the existing codebase...

What is incompatible?

kai
-- 
Be indiscrete.  Do it continuously.