On 27 Feb 2001, Daniel Pittman wrote: > This is a description of what I have implemented and working in the > path parser at the moment, modulo ensuring that it all works. The > optional-ness of things is somewhat vague at present. This is way cool. Mouth watering. *longing look* > The path structure is: <tag> <connect>+ <path> > > A connect expression is: [ <protocol> ] [ <user> "@" ] [ <host> ] > ":" I'm afraid something might need to be done to allow filenames with `:' on them (on the remote host). Hm. Maybe `::' could be the end of the connect list? Another idea for `/!:' is `/tr:' which I guess also works on Windows. But `/!:' is also nice. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.
- Time for Tramp 2.0? Kai Großjohann
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Stefan Monnier
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Kai Großjohann
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Stefan Monnier
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Skip Montanaro
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Daniel Pittman
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Kai Großjohann
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Daniel Pittman
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Kai Großjohann
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Daniel Pittman
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Kai Großjohann
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Stefan Monnier
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Daniel Pittman
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Kai Großjohann
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Daniel Pittman
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Francesco Potorti`
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Skip Montanaro
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Kai Großjohann
- Re: Time for Tramp 2.0? Daniel Pittman