On Jan 23, 2010, at 3:24 AM, Thomas McQuillan wrote: > Yes, it does have a nice gritty realism about it. But I wonder if you > might be better off using the page as a set of links to the various > parts of the project (the mailing list, the twitter lists, the github > repo, the wiki, the feature wish-list, etc.). The current set up seems > more suited to a closed-source shareware app than what's shaping up > here.
Well, it depends. Is the "homepage" for Letters development going to be on github or lettersapp.com? One could argue that in order to make it a /friendly/ open source project, the public and contributors sites should be separate. By friendly, I'm stating an opinion that end-users aren't interested in stuff like letters-dev and github. As such, I'd like to see the 2 in completely different areas. Perhaps lettersapp.com is the public face, but then at the bottom have a link to the contributor's site (whether hosted on lettersapp.com or github) where all of the gory details are held. (IMO, it's like the difference between ubuntu.com and kernel.org) Regards, Boone _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
