On 26-Jan-2010, at 11:49, Andrew Laurence wrote: > At 10:59 AM -0700 1/26/10, LuKreme wrote: >> On 26-Jan-10 06:08, John C. Welch wrote: >>> Also, if someone knows of a better, in terms of standard support, IMAP >>> client than mulberry, please share, I'd love to check it out, but for now, >>> if you want an example of how to do IMAP right, Mulberry is still the >>> exemplar. >> >> I've been looking at Mulberry and I can say that in terms of designing a UI >> and most especially in terms of handling preferences ther are few mail >> clients I've seen that are worse that Mulberry. > > I would not EVER put up Mulberry as an example of UI. It's IMAP protocol > implementation, however, is one of the finest to be found.
Seems to be a lot more solid that anything else I've used, but that's based on only a couple of hours of looking at it. There are things it does 'the right way' that I dislike, but that has more to do with my habits than with Mulberry. But egads, the UI makes my eyes bleed! :) -- 'What can I do? I'm only human,' he said aloud. Someone said, Not all of you. --Pyramids _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
