> I thought Letters was already decided to be an IMAP only client, and that if > POP3 is supported, it would be a plugin for those few unwashed heretics that > aren't using IMAP. > > Er, I mean those rapacious luddites... > > Ah, I meant to say those poor sucker stuck on archaic mailserver... > > No no, I really meant to say those people who still choose to use POP3. > > > Dude, ever try a big IMAP sync over the 9600 bps Thuraya data network? Or on > an African GSM network with 25-50% uptimes with anywhere from 10-50% packet > loss? There are some situations where POP3 is the correct solution. Hell, > even on a BGAN or a VSAT with 800ms+ latencies, IMAP can be > impractical. > > I realize fully that I'm an outlier but I want to know if the issue of IMAP > only is already set in stone. What's the zeitgeist on this? > > If POP will be supported via a plugin, will it be a core plugin? Or has the > architecture not been settled either? > > Sorry if I'm rehashing a settled topic - I'm still working my way through the > archives, the search function is broken and a Google site: search is breaking > threading to the point where some topics are unreadable. > >
if you need a killer POP client just get Mailsmith and be done. Seriously, it is good. And frankly the fact that Rich wouldn't do IMAP should frighten the rest of us. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
