Well, I don't think this is the email client for them then. So far from what I have read on the Internet, "only decision that has been made is that it'll focus on IMAP"
I supposed that doesn't exclude POP3, but POP3 certainly isn't the focus of this application.
- Jonathan On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Rhy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:04 PM, LuKreme <[email protected]> wrote: I thought Letters was already decided to be an IMAP only client, and that if POP3 is supported, it would be a plugin for those few unwashed heretics that aren't using IMAP. Er, I mean those rapacious luddites... Ah, I meant to say those poor sucker stuck on archaic mailserver... No no, I really meant to say those people who still choose to use POP3. Dude, ever try a big IMAP sync over the 9600 bps Thuraya data network? Or on an African GSM network with 25-50% uptimes with anywhere from 10-50% packet loss? There are some situations where POP3 is the correct solution. Hell, even on a BGAN or a VSAT with 800ms+ latencies, IMAP can be impractical. I realize fully that I'm an outlier but I want to know if the issue of IMAP only is already set in stone. What's the zeitgeist on this? If POP will be supported via a plugin, will it be a core plugin? Or has the architecture not been settled either? Sorry if I'm rehashing a settled topic - I'm still working my way through the archives, the search function is broken and a Google site: search is breaking threading to the point where some topics are unreadable.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
