On Tue, 3 May 2011 09:27:28 -0500, Chris Radek wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:28:43AM +0200, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> - reformatting. I know this is a nono, but occasionally source files
>> are very hard to read and edit due to formatting and indentation, 
>> and
>> the temptation is high to do that. Beyond the occasional source 
>> file:
>> Can we discuss a 'whitespace reformat day'?
>
> I am entirely against this.  It makes version control work badly
> across the change, both for human consumption (viewing patches) and
> merges.
>
> I believe that in no way does the incremental ease of reading
> uniformly-formatted code make up for these problems.
>
> Also I believe that in order to do this we'd need to agree on the 
> "one
> true style" of code, and all such discussions about style and
> whitespace are 100% a waste of time.

 I agree with you that versioning control across the change breaks 
 history and causes other problems.

 On the other hand, if you would entertain such a thing it can be 
 accomplished as part of a major revision, and then strict adherence to 
 programming guidelines.  The trick would be to develop a working code 
 standard, start using it for new posts and reviews, and then migrate 
 over as part of the next revision.

   EBo --


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to