On 25 January 2012 21:44, Kenneth Lerman <kenneth.ler...@se-ltd.com> wrote:
> If this were old style code (XA YB) it would not be valid because it contains > two letters in a row. By eliminating the early whitespace removal, 'XA YB' > and 'AXYB' would mean two different things. 'X 123' and 'X123' would still be > interpreted identically. Just to throw another idea into the mix, would it make sense to leave the G-code as it is, and accept a different command language, perhaps STEP-NC? -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
