On 1/27/2012 4:23 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 27 January 2012 21:14, Kent A. Reed<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> (the next-generation next-generation controller?).
> The wish-list for that, for me, would include a reversible,
> jerk-limited, pause-and-resumable motion system.
You've stated the above as requirements.
> I think I would keep most of the rest of it, but the inter-module
> communications seems bafflingly complex. (I think mhaberler is already
> looking at that though)
That's an implementation detail. I'd state it as a requirement. The 
inter-module interfaces shall be documented and "as simple as possible, 
but no simpler."
I think it's worth commenting that in at least one area, the original 
EMC did a great job. The one I'm thinking of is the abstraction of the 
"canonical machine".
Regards,

Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to