-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm still working on figuring those out as well. :)
Near as I can tell, since there's no kernel space vs. user space with the preempt-rt patch (everything runs in user-space), the realtime and user-mode functions can be the same so the functions were merged into linux_common.h. I can't vouch for how correct this is for linuxcnc v2.5, but pretty much the code seems to work for the 2.4.4. On 4/26/2012 12:24 PM, Jan de Kruyf wrote: > I dont seem to get 'rtapi_shmem_new()' and friends in > ./rtapi/linux_rtapi.c which presumably is the rtapi interface in > the case of rt_preempt. > > j. > > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Charles Steinkuehler < > char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote: > > On 4/26/2012 2:49 AM, John Morris wrote: >>>> Well, no solution yet, and only narrowed things a little >>>> bit: >>>> >>>> Continuing Charles's work, I merged the bitmuster-patched >>>> v2.4.4 forward. Whatever changes are causing the problem >>>> Charles describes were introduced between v2.4.7 and v2.5.0, >>>> and also between v2.5.0-pre0 and v2.5.0-pre1. >>>> > > Thanks for digging into this! > > Looking at diffs between the versions above, I think the problem > may be related to the changes in the handling of mem_id, > lib_mem_id, and comp->mem_id in hal_init and elsewhere. > > No smoking gun yet, but I had previously ignored these changes, as > it looked to me like the comp->mem_id was something added by > bitmuster for their shared memory area tests since it didn't exist > in the linuxcnc 2.5 codebase. Looking at the linuxcnc diff from > 2.5.0-pre0 to 2.5.0-pre1, however, I see that this is a linuxcnc > change and did not come from bitmuster. > > I suspect something in the preempt-rt patches needs to be updated > or tweaked to account for this change, but I still don't understand > the code well enough to pinpoint what might need fixing. > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security >> and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >> Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and >> the latest in malware threats. >> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ Emc-developers >> mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the > latest in malware threats. > http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers > mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers - -- Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+ZnbsACgkQLywbqEHdNFyqOACgsSMgV/G1Pt/OEB9Qi6sTu7/Z gj0AniuH9GMgsJlQGtWL9RN2yrH30UZe =lcb4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
