2012/5/1 Michael Haberler <mai...@mah.priv.at>: > on #linuxcnc-devel there's currently a discussion (mostly cradek and me in > the last few days) about a future linuxcnc design. In that context, > 'queuebusters' and the synchronization of interpreter state came up. > > I think I came up with a more elegant, flexible and language independent > solution to this issue than we currently have > > I've written up some thoughts here: > http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?QueuebustersRevisited > > I'd appreciate any comments
I love reading Your explanations! Because at least during reading I feel that I understand it. Could You, please, explain, what is the benefit of these changes? You mentioned "lookahead" several times. Do I understand correctly that it includes the same "lookahead" of more than 1 g-code line for trajectory planner that was discussed in relation to arcs and other part geometry being described as small G1 moves? Viesturs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
