Am 08.08.2012 um 12:57 schrieb Michael Haberler: > > Am 08.08.2012 um 12:24 schrieb EBo: > >> why would GPLv3 preclude its use? ... but that is a seperate questions >> I suppose... > > this is how I understand the situation:
Pieter Hintjens, zeromq impresario, on the issue: #zeromq: mhaberler:sorry to bug with a licensing question. I consider zeromq as candidate for linuxcnc.org which is GPLv2 only. I assume I am stuck with 'not license compatible' in column 1, row 6 of http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility ? [2:10pm]pieterh:mhaberler: hi [2:10pm]pieterh:not license compatible, sorry [2:11pm]mhaberler:thanks! I'm actually at odds understanding what the "some parts of linuxcnc are are 'GPLv2 or later'" actually helps in this context -m ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
