On 12 August 2012 15:32, Kenneth Lerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> The difference is that the logic component and arithmetic component had > (virtually) unlimited inputs and outputs. The configurations for those > components let you "say" things like: > (For the arithmetic component) > offset = range/2 > gain = 2 * (basis + offset) > Thoughts, comments, ideas? I think that being able to use simple mathematical/logic expressions in HAL would be a huge improvement. I am not sure how easy it would be in practice, but it seems that the HAL parser might be able to loadrt a gain every time it sees * and a sum2 if it sees a + or -. However, I am not sure that is the _right_ way to do it. There is no thread-based interpretation of "net" commands, though, so I don't know if there is any other way to do it. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
