>> > Have you tried your SCARA config in the JA3 branch? This is intended to >> > increase the abstraction between joints and axes.
I just checked out and tried it. It works and it’s clear; it's improved a lot. Axes and joints are now clearly differentiated. I see that pushing this change to master will make backward compatibility problems with existing configurations, so existing configurations will need some modifications. However clarification between axes and joints seems to be a must (at least for robotics). Will this improvement be pushed into master in the near future? I’d love help testing or anything I can. Thanks, Bence 2012/10/31 andy pugh <[email protected]>: > On 31 October 2012 18:49, Bence Kovács <[email protected] >> wrote: > >> > Have you tried your SCARA config in the JA3 branch? This is intended to >> > increase the abstraction between joints and axes. >> >> Do you mean branch joints_axes3? >> > > Yes, sorry for not being more explicit. > > -- > atp > If you can't fix it, you don't own it. > http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. > Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics > Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
