On 16 August 2013 12:50, EBo <e...@sandien.com> wrote: > Why not just have jog respect each axis limit in tern, and not group > them by linear and rotational?
Because it is complicated with a non-trivial machine. I think that there are controllers that don't even try, and simply require all jogs to be joint-mode. The specific case I am talking about is where a jog is altering the approach angle of the tool to the work (A and B axes) while not altering the tool-tip position in XYZ space. To do this requires movement of the X, Y and Z Joints, but there is no change in the XYZ coordinates. I have a feeling that I have looked at this before and that it all works fine for incremental and jogwheel jogs. I will check that point tonight. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
