> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:57:19 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Some trajectory testing between mach and
> linuxcnc
>
> One thing to remember is the current linuxcnc trajectory planner seems
> to be rock solid. I don't remember someone having some odd motion that
> could not be explained. A lot of work/testing went into this.
>
> sam
I don't think anyone has suggested otherwise, but it is not a good reason to
not try to improve it.
It seems short line contour programs are common and I bet it will increase in
the future.
It is also unfortunate that our current TP is really only understood by a
couple of people.
That's why I suggested trying to document it first so the entry barrier is
lower.
I found the comparison interesting. If only to point out that the TP needs some
work
for certain types of fairly common machines/machining.
Did you post your findings in the Mach forums that you read?
It might be an interesting read of the responses and confirm some
findings of theirs. After all the 'I told you so', there may be info that would
be
helpful if we decide to tackle TP improvements.
Chris M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/22/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=64545871&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
